Back to Blogs

Blog

Best API Gateway in 2025: Top Tools, Features, and Selection Guide

written by
Dhayalan Subramanian
Associate Director - Product Growth at DigitalAPI

Updated on: 

APIs account for roughly 70–83% of internet traffic in 2025, which puts gateway decisions on the critical path for uptime, security, and latency at scale. As estates span microservices, serverless, and legacy systems, the best API gateway centralises authentication, policy enforcement, and protocol mediation so clients stay simple. 

Selecting well means balancing low‑latency performance with governance, observability, and operational fit across on‑prem, cloud, and hybrid environments. AI‑assisted policy and analytics are shifting this calculus by automating detection, optimisation, and response during live traffic. 

This guide clarifies the selection criteria, compares 10 widely adopted gateways with concise pros, cons, and fit scenarios, and closes with practical recommendations mapped to architectural needs

What is an API gateway?

An API gateway is the single entry point that sits between clients and backend services. It accepts API requests, authenticates and authorises callers, routes traffic to the right microservices, aggregates responses, and returns a consistent result. It centralises cross-cutting concerns such as rate limiting, quota enforcement, schema validation, request and response transformation, protocol translation, TLS termination, and caching. 

By offloading these functions from individual services, a gateway reduces duplication, hardens security at the edge, and improves reliability under load. It also exposes policy and observability controls, including logging, metrics, tracing, and anomaly detection, so teams can govern behaviour and troubleshoot quickly. 

Modern gateways support REST, gRPC, GraphQL, WebSocket, and event-driven patterns, and integrate with identity providers for OAuth and OIDC. They run in managed clouds, containers, or on-premises, and can work alongside service meshes to separate north-south and east-west traffic concerns.

Why does the API gateway matter in 2025?

API estates now span Kubernetes microservices, serverless functions, and legacy systems across on-prem, cloud, and hybrid environments, which makes the gateway a critical control point for security, latency, and uptime. 

That progression is why it matters now, as the gateway anchors uptime, security, latency, and compliance, while enabling consistent governance, deep observability, monetisation, and flexible multi-gateway or multi-cloud operations.

API gateway selection checklist: critical features

The right API gateway must excel across security, performance, governance, developer experience, and deployment flexibility to support modern architectures at scale. The checklist below helps quickly validate zero‑trust enforcement, stable latency under load, deep visibility, streamlined onboarding and monetisation, and fit for cloud, hybrid, and on‑prem environments.

API gateway selection checklist: critical features

The right API gateway must excel across security, performance, governance, developer experience, and deployment flexibility to support modern architectures at scale. The checklist below helps quickly validate zero‑trust enforcement, stable latency under load, deep visibility, streamlined onboarding and monetisation, and fit for cloud, hybrid, and on‑prem environments.

Selection pillar Must-have criteria
Security and zero‑trust OAuth/OIDC, mTLS, WAF, schema validation, threat detection, policy‑as‑code
Performance and scale Low‑latency data planes, resilient clustering, global distribution, cache and throttling controls
Governance and observability Consistent policies, metrics, tracing, analytics, and audit trails across environments
Developer experience & monetisation Portals, documentation, SDKs, subscription plans, and billing workflows
Deployment flexibility Self‑hosted, managed, hybrid/multi‑cloud, service‑mesh awareness, and on‑prem data residency

Top 10 API gateway lineups

This lineup highlights leading API gateway platforms across open-source, commercial, and cloud-managed models, with concise snapshots of capabilities, deployment choices, and ecosystem strengths. Use it to compare governance depth, performance, portability, and pricing at a glance, then align candidates to target architectures and compliance requirements.

1. Helix Gateway by DigitalAPI

Helix Gateway is a fast, lightweight API gateway that streamlines the full delivery flow design, deploy, secure, and observe so operational APIs become discoverable products with minimal DevOps overhead. Teams can use a native design studio or import OpenAPI/Swagger, apply org‑wide security policies, and control traffic with built‑in rate limits, quotas, and metering for immediate production readiness. 

Helix is AI‑ready by default via an out‑of‑the‑box MCP capability and integrates with a unified catalogue and marketplace to power discovery, governance, and monetisation without third‑party dependencies.

Strengths

  • Plug‑and‑play setup to secure, configure, and monitor APIs in minutes.
  • Native design studio plus OpenAPI/Swagger import for instant publishing.
  • Built‑in rate limiting, quota enforcement, and metering for granular traffic control.
  • Org‑wide security policies including JWT, OAuth2, CORS, and rate limits.
  • Low latency via lightweight execution, connection pooling, and response caching.
  • AI‑ready by default: convert any API into an MCP‑compliant, agent‑consumable format in one click.
  • Integrated service hub and marketplace with built‑in analytics, avoiding third‑party tools.
  • Unified internal catalogue for APIs across multiple gateways, managed from a single view.
  • Deploy and scale across public cloud, private data centres, and edge environments.
  • Startup‑friendly pricing: first 3 months or 25M transactions included.

Use cases

  • Rapid production gateway for end‑to‑end API design, deployment, governance, and AI‑agent consumption without assembling multiple tools.
  • Partner and external programs that need an integrated marketplace, built‑in analytics, and monetisation‑ready controls.
  • Multi‑gateway estates seeking a unified catalogue, consistent policy posture, and real‑time insights while retaining heterogeneous runtimes.

2. Kong

Kong Gateway is a cloud native, high-performance API proxy and gateway for microservices that runs across Kubernetes, virtual machines, and bare metal in both on-prem and cloud environments. 

Its plugin architecture lets teams add authentication, rate limiting, request and response transformation, logging, and AI-oriented capabilities without changing service code, and it can be managed declaratively as configuration as code or via an admin API. 

Native Kubernetes support includes an Ingress Controller, CRDs, and an operator to apply policies consistently and autoscale across clusters, while hybrid control plane and data plane modes enable multi-region and multi-cloud topologies. 

It handles REST, gRPC, GraphQL, and WebSocket traffic, integrates with common observability stacks, and can operate in DB-less mode for simpler and faster deployments.

Strengths

  • High-performance core
  • Rich plugin ecosystem
  • Mature Kubernetes ingress and controller options

Areas to improve

  • Multi-cluster and multi-region scale increases operational complexity without disciplined governance
  • Advanced features and customisations add maintenance and upgrade overhead

Use cases

  • Extensible microservices programs needing hybrid or multi-cloud flexibility and benefiting from strong community depth

3. NGINX 

NGINX, including NGINX Plus and NGINX Gateway Fabric, provides a high‑performance data plane that can operate as an API gateway, reverse proxy, and Kubernetes Gateway API implementation for edge and hybrid deployments. 

It emphasises low latency, predictable throughput, and a compact footprint, making it a strong fit for performance‑sensitive ingress and granular traffic control. Teams can deploy it at the edge, inside clusters, or across hybrid environments, and configure it declaratively via Kubernetes resources or traditional configuration files.

Strengths

  • Proven low‑latency performance under high concurrency
  • Flexible edge and hybrid deployment patterns with fine‑grained control
  • Efficient footprint suitable for resource‑constrained environments

Areas to improve

  • Lighter out‑of‑the‑box API management unless paired with additional platform components
  • Advanced lifecycle needs, such as portals, analytics, and monetisation, typically require external tooling

Use cases

  • Performance‑sensitive ingress and API scenarios for ops‑centric teams that want granular control over routing, security, and scaling

4. Tyk 

Tyk is an open source first API gateway and management platform that includes the gateway, dashboard, developer portal, and a Kubernetes operator, with support for hybrid and multi-data centre control planes. 

It runs on premises, in the cloud, or across multi-cloud estates, and handles REST, gRPC, GraphQL, and WebSocket traffic with policy control, analytics, and declarative configuration options.

Strengths

  • Hybrid and multi-cloud deployment flexibility with centralised control
  • Developer-friendly workflows across the gateway, dashboard, and portal
  • Kubernetes native components, including an operator and CRDs

Areas to improve

  • Smaller commercial ecosystem compared to long-standing enterprise suites in regulated contexts
  • Some advanced enterprise add-ons may require extra integration effort

Use cases

  • Hybrid or multi-cloud API programs that want open source flexibility, strong policy control, and Kubernetes native operations

5. Apigee

Apigee is a full‑featured API management platform with a robust policy layer for security, traffic management, mediation, analytics, and monetization across cloud and hybrid environments. It provides API proxies, a developer portal, monetisation workflows, and advanced API security with deep analytics to govern large API estates. 

It supports REST, gRPC, GraphQL, and SOAP, and offers a managed service as well as a hybrid mode to run runtime components in Kubernetes while keeping centralised control.

Strengths

  • Enterprise‑grade security, governance, and compliance controls
  • Advanced analytics, monitoring, and monetisation with strong lifecycle tooling
  • A hybrid deployment option that separates the control plane and runtime for on‑prem and multi‑cloud

Areas to improve

  • Higher cost and operational complexity for simple routing or small API footprints
  • A steeper learning curve and a broader platform surface than lightweight gateways

Use cases

  • Large enterprises prioritising governance, monetization, and mature analytics across hybrid or multi‑cloud programs

6. AWS API Gateway

AWS API Gateway is a fully managed service for REST, HTTP, and WebSocket APIs that integrates deeply with AWS services and serverless runtimes. It offers request validation, throttling and quotas, usage plans and API keys, custom authorizers, caching for REST APIs, VPC links, and stage-based deployments with CloudWatch observability. 

Pay-as-you-go pricing and automatic scaling make it a strong fit for serverless and AWS-centric estates.

Strengths

  • Elastic serverless scale with managed availability and regional options
  • Tight integrations with Lambda, IAM, Cognito, CloudWatch, CloudFront, PrivateLink, and ALB
  • Usage-based pricing aligned to traffic, with a free tier for new accounts

Areas to improve

  • Portability trade-offs for multi-cloud or on-prem strategies
  • Feature depth and lifecycle tooling are AWS-centric, often needing complementary services for portals or monetisation

Use cases

  • Serverless and AWS-centric workloads that need integrated authentication, observability, and minimal operations

7. MuleSoft (Anypoint)

MuleSoft’s Anypoint Platform combines API Manager with design, runtime, integration, governance, and Exchange components to deliver a unified enterprise API program across cloud and on-prem environments. 

The suite spans API design and policy enforcement, runtime management, and a reusable asset catalogue through Anypoint Exchange for discovery and reuse at scale. Hybrid operations with centralised control support large estates that need consistent governance, security, and visibility.

Strengths

  • Deep fusion of integration and API lifecycle enables centralised governance and broad discoverability
  • Built-in analytics, monitoring, and security policies with compliance options for regulated industries
  • Anypoint Exchange promotes reuse through connectors, templates, and managed discovery

Areas to improve

  • Licensing and platform breadth can exceed needs for straightforward edge or lightweight API routing
  • Broader platform surface and runtime dependencies add complexity for small teams and simple estates

Use cases

  • Enterprises unifying API and integration programs under a single suite with centralised governance and discovery across hybrid deployments

8. WSO2

WSO2 API Manager is a full‑lifecycle, open‑source platform for designing, securing, governing, and monetising APIs across cloud, on‑prem, and hybrid deployments. It bundles a gateway, key manager, traffic manager, analytics, and a developer portal, and supports REST, GraphQL, SOAP, and WebSocket APIs with policy‑as‑code and fine‑grained access controls. 

Deployment models include fully self‑hosted, private cloud, and managed options with strong on‑prem controls for data residency and compliance.

Strengths

  • Open‑source lineage with enterprise options and deep customisation
  • Strong on‑prem and regulated‑environment controls with full lifecycle governance
  • Flexible deployment models and rich policy and security features

Areas to improve

  • Self‑hosting and customisation increase operational overhead without disciplined SRE and DevOps practices
  • Ecosystem integrations and upgrades can require more hands‑on effort than fully managed suites

Use cases

  • Cost‑sensitive or customisation-heavy programs in regulated or on‑prem contexts that need full control over the API stack

9. Gravitee

Gravitee combines an API gateway with event‑native capabilities, supporting decoupled entrypoints and endpoints with mediation across REST and streaming protocols. It can expose event streams through consumer‑friendly interfaces alongside traditional APIs, enabling unified policy application, discovery, and monitoring across synchronous and asynchronous traffic. 

An open‑source core and flexible deployment options (cloud, on‑prem, Kubernetes) make it adaptable to varied platform needs.

Strengths

  • Event‑driven features for Kafka, MQTT, WebSockets, SSE, and more
  • Protocol mediation to bridge streaming backends with RESTful and real‑time interfaces
  • Open‑source core enabling flexible, policy‑driven customisation and extensibility

Areas to improve

  • Ecosystem and enterprise maturity may lag incumbents for complex global programs
  • Very large, regulated, multi‑region rollouts may require added diligence for support and integrations

Use cases

  • Event‑driven API programs that need robust async support alongside REST, with unified governance and policy control

10. IBM API Connect 

IBM API Connect is an integrated API lifecycle platform that spans design, security, traffic management, analytics, and developer engagement, with flexible on‑prem, single‑tenant cloud, and hybrid deployment models. 

It provides an enterprise gateway, centralised policy enforcement, a customizable developer portal, and advanced monitoring to govern large, distributed API estates. Support for modern and legacy protocols, plus automated lifecycle tooling, helps standardise governance across regulated and hybrid environments.

Strengths

  • Enterprise‑grade security, analytics, and governance for regulated and hybrid environments
  • Flexible deployment models: on‑prem, single‑tenant cloud, and hybrid with centralised control
  • Robust lifecycle tooling across design, runtime, policy management, and developer engagement

Areas to improve

  • Heavier footprint and complexity than cloud‑native gateways for simple edge routing
  • Higher operational overhead and licensing considerations for smaller teams or narrow use cases

Use cases

  • Regulated industries combining strict on‑prem control with global governance, analytics, and consistent policy enforcement across hybrid estates

Head-to-head comparison

Head-to-head comparison spotlights where leading gateways diverge on security posture, governance depth, runtime performance, deployment flexibility, and total cost of ownership.. Use the comparison to align options with target architectures, compliance requirements, and delivery timelines, then validate the fit.

Gateway Model Deployment Notable strengths
Helix Gateway by DigitalAPI Commercial gateway with integrated service hub and marketplace Public cloud, private data centres, and edge Plug‑and‑play setup, AI‑ready MCP, unified catalogue, built‑in analytics and marketplace
Kong Open‑source core + enterprise Self‑hosted, Kubernetes, hybrid Performance, plugin ecosystem
NGINX Commercial + OSS lineage Edge, self‑hosted, hybrid Low‑latency data plane
Tyk Open‑source + enterprise Hybrid/multi‑cloud, self‑hosted Hybrid control plane, DX
Apigee Enterprise suite Managed cloud and hybrid Security, analytics, monetisation
AWS API Gateway Fully managed AWS cloud (serverless) Tight AWS integration
MuleSoft Enterprise suite Cloud, hybrid, on‑prem Integration + lifecycle
WSO2 Open‑source + enterprise Self‑hosted, hybrid Customisation, on‑prem control
Gravitee.io Open‑source + enterprise Self‑hosted, hybrid Event‑native policies
IBM API Connect Enterprise suite On‑prem, hybrid Security, analytics

AI‑powered API gateway and automation trends

API gateways are embedding AI copilots that draft and validate policies from specs, spot anomalies in near real time, and surface traffic intelligence that once demanded manual analysis. These assistants recommend guardrails (rate limits, auth scopes, data redaction), auto-tune controls based on usage patterns, and generate actionable runbooks, which reduces toil and accelerate compliant rollouts across teams.

As agentic integrations rise, programs are standardising on machine-readable contracts and MCP-ready endpoints so agents can reason over capabilities, negotiate scopes, and chain workflows safely. The practical focus is robust authentication and authorisation, explainable and fine-grained policy controls, and governance as code with drift detection and audit trails, so async, streaming, and REST interfaces remain secure, observable, and automatable at scale.

How to choose the right API gateway

The right gateway depends on regulatory demands, operating model, and team skills; align security, governance, scale, and developer workflow needs to the target environment, and choose the tool that minimises toil while meeting non‑negotiables.

Regulated industries (banking, insurance, healthcare)

  • Prioritise provable security controls: OAuth 2.0/OIDC, mTLS, fine‑grained authorisation, secrets management, key rotation, and FIPS‑validated crypto where required.
  • Enforce governance at scale: central policy catalogues, approval workflows, API versioning, deprecation controls, schema validation, and contract testing.
  • Meet compliance and audit needs: data residency, PII/PHI protection, masking and tokenisation, immutable logs, audit trails, and policy‑as‑code with change history.
  • Support partner ecosystems: developer portals with role‑based access, subscription plans, SLAs, and throttling tailored to external consumers.
  • Engineer for resilience: active‑active or regional failover, disaster recovery objectives, predictable latency, and capacity planning for regulatory peak events.

Cloud‑native and microservices

  • Go Kubernetes‑first: native Gateway API or Ingress support, CRDs and operators, GitOps pipelines, and progressive delivery (canary, blue‑green).
  • Optimise for protocols and performance: HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, gRPC, WebSocket support, low‑latency data plane, connection reuse, and efficient TLS termination.
  • Integrate with the platform: service mesh interoperability, service discovery, autoscaling, pod disruption budgets, and pod‑level policies.
  • Build for observability: distributed tracing, structured logs, RED/Golden signals, SLOs with alerting, and out‑of‑the‑box dashboards.
  • Reduce operational friction: declarative configuration, templated policies, environment promotion, DB‑less or lightweight control planes, and drift detection.

Quick selection guide

  • Choose a governance‑heavy, auditable platform if compliance, external partner onboarding, and audit readiness are the top priorities.
  • Choose a Kubernetes‑native, performance‑focused gateway if microservices velocity, GitOps, and deep cloud integration matter most.
  • If both apply, adopt a federated approach: a centralised governance layer plus workload‑aligned gateways for each environment.

Federated control: Manage multiple gateways with DigitalAPI

To operationalise the federated approach recommended above, DigitalAPI provides a gateway‑agnostic control plane that standardises policy, catalogue, and analytics across heterogeneous gateways without migrations, aligning with this guide’s emphasis on centralised governance and multi‑cloud flexibility.

Teams can keep Kong, NGINX, Apigee, or cloud‑native gateways where they fit best while unifying access, developer experience, and compliance in one place.

See DigitalAPI’s API gateway manager in action

Book a personalised 30-minute walkthrough

Open‑source vs Commercial vs Cloud API gateways

The right API gateway model, whether open‑source, commercial, or cloud‑managed, depends on priorities across cost, control, speed, and portability. An overview of trade‑offs in governance, extensibility, support, and operational effort helps align choices with architecture and compliance. Define non‑negotiables for security, auditability, and data residency, then weigh elasticity and vendor lock‑in to shortlist candidates.

Dimension Open‑source gateways Commercial suites Cloud‑managed gateways
Typical gateways Kong OSS, Tyk OSS, APISIX, KrakenD Apigee, MuleSoft, Axway, Layer7 AWS API Gateway, Azure API Management, API Gateway on GCP
Cost model No license fees; infra, support, and team time drive total cost Subscriptions or enterprise licenses; add‑ons for analytics, security, monetisation Pay per request, messages, minutes, and data transfer; minimal fixed costs
Customization Highest; code and plugins are fully extensible Moderate; extensibility via vendor SDKs and policy packs Lowest; limited to provider features and policies
Security and compliance Solid core controls; certifications depend on deployment Enterprise controls, audit, and certifications are available Strong controls aligned to cloud IAM and services
Performance and latency Excellent when tuned; low overhead data planes Very good; may add overhead from policy layers Very good; benefits from provider edge and autoscaling
Hybrid and multi‑cloud First‑class when self‑hosted across estates Strong federation and centralised control are common Limited; cloud‑first with workarounds for hybrid
Vendor lock‑in risk Low; standard specs and self‑hosting reduce lock‑in Medium; suites integrate many proprietary features High; policies, auth, and routing tied to provider
Ecosystem and support Community support; paid support optional Enterprise SLAs, roadmaps, and expert services Cloud SLAs and support plans; rapid service evolution
Hidden costs Maintenance, upgrades, security hardening, on‑call Licensing scope creep, add‑ons, training Data egress, logging, cross‑service charges
Best fit Custom, hybrid, cost‑sensitive, or high‑control programs Regulated, monetised, or large multi‑team programs Serverless and cloud‑centric workloads that need speed

What derails API gateway deployment

A successful gateway rollout hinges on matching architecture, security, and governance to real workload needs while keeping operations simple and auditable. The pitfalls below are the patterns that most often derail reliability, velocity, and compliance.

Scope control: prevent “edge router” projects from ballooning into full platform rebuilds

Security consistency: enforce OAuth or OIDC, mTLS, key rotation, and secret hygiene across environments

Reliability and performance: tune timeouts, connection pooling, autoscaling, caching, and multi‑region failover

Versioning and compatibility: manage breaking changes, schema validation, and safe request or response transforms

Observability: standardise logs, metrics, and traces with correlation IDs for end‑to‑end debugging

Configuration drift: adopt infrastructure as code, GitOps promotion, and automated policy tests

Multi‑gateway estates: centralise discovery, access, governance, and analytics without forced migration

7 API gateway deployment best practices

A resilient API gateway deployment aligns architecture, security, and operations with workload needs while keeping changes auditable and reversible. The practices below emphasise predictable delivery, strong governance, and efficient operations across clouds and teams.

  1. Design first and standardise: consistent styles, naming, error models, reusable policies, and machine-readable contracts.
  2. Security by default: TLS everywhere, OAuth 2.0 or OIDC, mTLS for service-to-service, least privilege, key rotation, secret hygiene.
  3. Policy as code: store policies and routing in version control, validate in CI, require approvals, and track change history.
  4. Reliability and performance: tuned timeouts, retries, circuit breakers, connection pooling, and caching with safe invalidation.
  5. Multi-region resilience: active-active or failover with traffic steering, health checks, and data locality considerations.
  6. Observability: standardised logs, metrics, and traces with correlation IDs, SLOs, and actionable alerts.
  7. Delivery automation: GitOps pipelines, environment promotion, canary and blue-green releases with instant rollback.

The next era of gateways: AI, MCP, observability

API gateways are shifting into intelligent control planes that broker traffic for humans and AI agents while enforcing stronger governance and safety. The next wave centres on agent-aware policies, MCP readiness for machine interfaces, and real-time observability that turns signals into decisions.

AI agents

Gateways will classify and govern agent traffic with token budgets, rate shaping, and model-aware quotas that align spend with ROI. Copilots will draft and validate policies from specs, detect anomalies in near real time, and propose guardrails like auth scopes, data redaction, and PII masking to reduce toil and risk. 

Safety pipelines will include prompt filtering, output moderation, and grounded retrieval checks, plus signed request verification and replay protection for tool calls.

MCP readiness

MCP-ready endpoints will expose machine-readable capabilities, input and output schemas, and explicit consent scopes so agents can discover actions safely. Policy decisions will bind to identities, purposes, and proofs of consent, with non-repudiation through signed requests and auditable traces. 

Sandboxed tool execution, idempotency keys, and fine-grained rate limits will contain blast radius while preserving agent autonomy.

Observability

Expect standardised logs, metrics, and traces with correlation IDs across services, plus OpenTelemetry-first pipelines and trace-based sampling that preserves critical paths. Gateways will enrich spans with actor, client, policy, and cost metadata, enabling SLOs tied to user impact rather than raw throughput. 

Real-time anomaly detection, drift checks on policies, and audit event streams will move observability from after-the-fact diagnostics to continuous control.

FAQs

1. Which API gateway is suited to microservices?

Choose gateways built for cloud‑native operations: strong Kubernetes integration (Ingress/Gateway API, CRDs/operators), low‑latency data planes, and policy‑as‑code for consistent security and traffic control. Kong, NGINX, and Tyk excel for microservices and mesh‑aware topologies, offering gRPC/HTTP/2 support, mTLS, rate limiting, circuit breaking, and rich observability. They align with GitOps workflows and scale reliably across clusters, regions, and hybrid environments with minimal overhead.

2. Are open‑source API gateways reliable for enterprise use?

Yes, open-source API gateways can be enterprise-reliable when backed by disciplined operations and support. Pair community or vendor-backed SLAs with rigorous security hardening (mTLS, OAuth/OIDC, WAF), timely patching, and policy-as-code. Engineer HA and DR, enforce observability (logs, metrics, traces), and run performance and pen tests. Budget for expert staffing, upgrades, and compliance audits to sustain scale and uptime over time and growth.

3. How does an API gateway improve security and scalability?

An API gateway strengthens security by centralising authentication and authorisation, enforcing mTLS, WAF, schema validation, and applying rate limiting and threat detection at the edge. It boosts scalability via resilient routing, load balancing, caching, retries, and circuit breaking, while decoupling clients from backend changes with versioning and transformation. This consistency reduces duplication, protects services, and enables horizontal scale across environments.

4. What’s the difference between an API gateway and a service mesh?

An API gateway sits at the edge and manages north–south traffic from clients to services, centralising auth, rate limiting, routing, and request/response transformation. A service mesh governs east–west service‑to‑service communication inside the cluster via sidecar proxies, providing mTLS, retries, circuit breaking, traffic shaping, and deep telemetry. They’re complementary: use a gateway for ingress, and a mesh for internal reliability and observability.

{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "Which API gateway is suited to microservices?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Choose gateways built for cloud-native operations: strong Kubernetes integration (Ingress/Gateway API, CRDs/operators), low-latency data planes, and policy-as-code for consistent security and traffic control. Kong, NGINX, and Tyk excel for microservices and mesh-aware topologies, offering gRPC/HTTP/2 support, mTLS, rate limiting, circuit breaking, and rich observability. They align with GitOps workflows and scale reliably across clusters, regions, and hybrid environments with minimal overhead." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Are open-source API gateways reliable for enterprise use?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes, open-source API gateways can be enterprise-reliable when backed by disciplined operations and support. Pair community or vendor-backed SLAs with rigorous security hardening (mTLS, OAuth/OIDC, WAF), timely patching, and policy-as-code. Engineer HA and DR, enforce observability (logs, metrics, traces), and run performance and pen tests. Budget for expert staffing, upgrades, and compliance audits to sustain scale and uptime over time and growth." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How does an API gateway improve security and scalability?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "An API gateway strengthens security by centralising authentication and authorisation, enforcing mTLS, WAF, schema validation, and applying rate limiting and threat detection at the edge. It boosts scalability via resilient routing, load balancing, caching, retries, and circuit breaking, while decoupling clients from backend changes with versioning and transformation. This consistency reduces duplication, protects services, and enables horizontal scale across environments." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What’s the difference between an API gateway and a service mesh?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "An API gateway sits at the edge and manages north–south traffic from clients to services, centralising auth, rate limiting, routing, and request/response transformation. A service mesh governs east–west service-to-service communication inside the cluster via sidecar proxies, providing mTLS, retries, circuit breaking, traffic shaping, and deep telemetry. They’re complementary: use a gateway for ingress, and a mesh for internal reliability and observability." } } ] }

Liked the post? Share on:

Don’t let your APIs rack up operational costs. Optimise your estate with DigitalAPI.

Book a Demo

You’ve spent years battling your API problem. Give us 60 minutes to show you the solution.

Get API lifecycle management, API monetisation, and API marketplace infrastructure on one powerful AI-driven platform.